(Editor’s note: Thanks to Steve King for allowing us to share with our users this analysis that first appeared on his blog, SmallBizLabs.com. Steve is a partner with the research and consulting firm Emergent Research and is an insightful and thought-provoking expert on the future of work, the rise of the independent workforce and the impact of big data on small businesses. The opinions expressed are his.)

Over the past month or so, there’s been a crescendo of negative press on the on-demand economy (or, sharing economy), with on-demand economy jobs being the primary target. The negative press tends to focus on Uber, which has established itself as the company everyone— except Uber users—hates due to, according to the company’s detractors, their rough and tumble business practices.

“The accurate view is this: Independent work is good for most and bad for many, a view that rarely shows up in the media.”

Steve King
Emergent Research


 Examples of recent negative press coverage of the sharing economy

The two opposing views of sharing economy jobs

  1. Supporters say the sharing economy not only provides good jobs that pay well, but also provides flexible work schedules and the ability for providers to become entrepreneurs and own their businesses.
  2. Critics say the sharing economy is creating a new class of serfs—poorly paid workers with few rights, benefits or legal protections.

So who’s right?

Both or neither, depending on how you look at it. In Emergent Research interviews, surveys and focus groups, independent workers almost always describe what we call the yin and yang —or two sides—of independent work (freelancing, self-employment, etc.).

Side #1

Independent workers tell [Emergent Research] they love the autonomy, control and flexibility working independently provides. At the same time, they tell us they are challenged by the stress, uncertainty and insecurity associated with independent work.

For most independent workers, the good outweighs the bad and the majority report they prefer being independent. In other words, they like their work, think of themselves as having a “good job” and prefer being independent over having a traditional job.

Side #2

But our research also shows a sizable minority of independent workers don’t like being independent. These people don’t like their work, think they have a “bad job” and would prefer traditional employment.

Bottomline: Good for most, not for all

The key factor indicating whether or not someone prefers independent work is how much work autonomy, control and flexibility they believe they have. Independents reporting happiness with their levels of work autonomy, control and flexibility generally report being highly satisfied with being an independent worker.

Those reporting being unhappy generally report not being satisfied.

This makes sense. These folks have the worst of both types of employment. They don’t have the autonomy, control or flexibility that makes independent work attractive—nor do they have the job security, benefits or legal protections associated with a traditional job. So in terms of the overall independent worker segment, both points of view—good and bad—are valid. But both of these points of view are incomplete.

The more nuanced and accurate view is this: independent work is good for most and bad for many. This view rarely shows up in the media.

In our research, we’ve started diving deeper on sharing economy jobs and so far we’re seeing the same pattern: Most of the providers we interviewed or surveyed like their sharing economy jobs, but a large minority don’t. And consistent with the broader independent worker segment, the key attribute is the amount of autonomy, control and flexibility providers have.

(Illustration: ThinkStock)


For those interested in more details on the yin and yang of independent work, the Job Makers Versus Task Takers section of the 2013 MBO State of Independence report covers this in more depth.

5
The On-Demand Economy May Be Headed for a Talent War

Are there enough independent contractors to meet the demand for the on-demand workers necessary to operate these companies?

6
“Are Uber Drivers Employees of Uber?” and Why The Answer is Important

Agencies like the California Labor Commission have issued rulings that Uber drivers are employees, not contractors. What does that mean to the future of the “on-demand economy.”

7
Amazon Expands its On-Demand Marketplace of ‘Home Services’ in 15 U.S. Metropolitan Areas

Amazon continues to go local with the expansion of Amazon Home Services, an on-demand marketplace to match customers with home-related service-providers.

8
What Were They Drinking? Startups Focusing on Same Day Alcohol Delivery

Same day alcohol delivery — wine, beer and spirits — is the last frontier in convenience and on-demand local delivery,

9
Coverage of an On-demand Economy Backlash Continues to Miss the Positives

The majority of on-demand workers like what they are doing, a fact missing from coverage suggesting there’s an on-demand economy backlash.

10
Google Testing a Search Tool for the On-Demand Economy

Google is testing a search-engine enabled on-demand marketplace.

11
Amazon Prime Now Drivers Join in On-Demand Economy Lawsuit Parade

Amazon.com is being sued in California courts by former Amazon Prime Now delivery drivers in a proposed class-action suit.

12
Amazon Moving Ahead of Google in Home Delivery Race, What That Means for Small Business

Amazon Prime Now is in 20 markets compared to Google Express’ seven.

13
On-demand Economy Participants Typically Work 12 Hours a Week to Augment Household Income

Augmenting their household income is the primary reason independent workers participate in the on-demand economy.

14
New Small Businesses Are Emerging From the On-demand Economy

The on-demand business model is growing the segment of small business called “sole proprietors” or “single employee” businesses

15
The Five Faces of the On-Demand Workforce

Participants in the on-demand economy fall into different groups, different motivations and different levels of satisfaction.

16
Small Businesses Using On-Demand Economy to Access Tech Talent Pool

Because of the wave of on-demand economy companies, even the smallest of small businesses can use an app to connect with independent tech workers.

17
Yelp Joins Google, Amazon and a Slew of Startups in Home Services On-Demand Marketplace

Yelp adds Request a Quote feature to participating service providers.

18
Uber Settlement Defines Drivers as Independent Small Businesses, Not Employees

Uber has agreed to a class-action lawsuit settlement with drivers in California and Massachusetts

19
Shopify’s Ecommerce Merchants Can Now Offer Local, Same-Day Delivery in 200+ U.S. Locations

Ecommerce software provider Shopify is teaming up with on-demand same-day delivery service Postmates.

20
Uber Didn’t Create the On-Demand Economy, The On-Demand Economy Created Uber

Uber exists because of the growing need for highly flexible part-time work to supplement incomes.

21
Voters’ Decision Keeps Austin Too Weird For Uber, Lyft

Uber and Lyft, the ride-sharing, on-demand economy companies, lost a key vote by focusing on the wrong messages.

22
Employers Prefer Full Time Workers, But Agree That On-Demand Economy is Here to Stay | 2016

Employers have a love-hate relationship with the on-demand economy.

23
The On-Demand Economy Workforce Continues to Expand | 2017

Two-thirds of on-demand economy participants say they are satisfied with their work

24
HomeAdvisor Buys Angie’s List to Grow its Home Services On-Demand Marketplace

To compete with the giants creating new, on-demand home services marketplaces, HomeAdvisor acquires Angie’s List.

25
Gallup: Most Employees Who Work Varying Hours Like Their Schedules | 2017

According to Gallup, the majority of employees who work variable hours each week report no problems or financial hardship with the variable hours.

26
Two Small Business Trends That Contributed to Ikea’s Decision to Buy TaskRabbit | 2017

Are the acquisitions of TaskRabbit and Angie’s List pointing to the consolidation of the gig economy?